|

The
federal government is forcing state governments to do its bidding, implying that
the states are subordinate to the federal government.
Seceding seldom succeeds, but Vermonters try
And its keynote - that separating from the United States is a just remedy
for the federal government's trampling of state sovereignty - is echoing
beyond the snow-capped Green Mountains.
From Hawaii to South Carolina, dozens of groups across America are
promoting a similar cause. Their efforts aren't politically popular - yet.
But they are reviving one of the most passionate debates in US history: Can
a state legally secede?
Source: Christian Science Monitor (online),
November 8, 2005
States Balk at National ID Card, Other Fed Mandates
States are continuing to see their
authority stepped on by the federal government, something that not only
curtails their independence in dealing with such matters as elections and
education, but in the case of a new national ID card, could cost them
financially, according to a new report.
In the report released Wednesday, the
National Conference of State Legislatures, a bipartisan group meeting in
Seattle this week, documents pending legislation that pre-empts state
authority, a problem that many say has increased in the past few years.
Source: News Max, August 18, 2005
National ID card, eminent domain, could trample states' rights
States are continuing to see their authority stepped on by the
federal government, something that not only curtails their independence in
dealing with such matters as elections and education, but in the case of a
new national ID card, could cost them financially, according to a new
report.
In the report released Tuesday, the National Conference of State
Legislatures, a bipartisan group meeting in Seattle this week, documents
pending legislation that pre-empts state authority, a problem that many say
has increased in the past few years.
Source: Seattle Post Intelligencer, August 16, 2005
Officials say EPA out of line
Top Colorado officials are accusing the
Environmental Protection Agency of trying to tell the state how to
regulate its rivers and streams, challenging Colorado's sovereignty
over its own water.
The issue erupted recently when the EPA blamed pollution in the
Dolores River on low flows, according to the state's top environmental
regulator and the state agriculture commissioner.
Source: RockyMountainNews (online), August 13, 2004
EPA Gets OK To Overrule States
The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the federal Environmental
Protection Agency can override state officials and order some
anti-pollution measures that may be more costly.
The 5-4 decision, a victory for environmentalists, found the EPA did not
go too far when it overruled a decision by Alaska regulators, who wanted
to let the operators of a zinc and lead mine use cheaper anti-pollution
technology for power generation.
Source: CBS News (online), January 21, 2004
High Court Ruling Gives HMO Patients More Choices
The
U.S. Supreme Court, in a decision that gives patients greater choice
in medical care, on Wednesday ruled that states may require health
maintenance organizations to open their networks to any doctor in
the region who agrees to abide by the plan's rules.
Source: Reuters, April 2, 2003
Congress passes national .08 blood alcohol
standard for drunken drivers
Congress passed a measure Friday adopting a 0.08 blood-alcohol level
as the national standard for drunken driving -- part of a $58 billion
transportation spending bill....The measure requires states to adopt the
stricter standard by 2004 or face penalties.
Source: CNN.com,
October 6, 2000
The New Federalism
Senator Richard Lugar's staff says the senator sees nothing unusual or sinister about
it. Rep. Bob Barr's staff didn't know anything about it. But more and more
congressmen are getting phone calls and messages from suspicious constituents who are
wondering what President Clinton is trying to pull. To traditional big government
advocates, it may be a dream come true but to critics, a new executive order which the
president signed and which will take effect by August 14th looks dubiously like a federal
monarchy.
Source: Free Congress Foundation, 1998
President Clinton's Sellout of Federalism
On May 14, 1998, without much fanfare or public attention, the
White House released a new executive order on federalism. President Bill Clinton's
Executive Order 13083 revokes E.O. 12612, issued by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. The
Clinton executive order outlines a series of new "Federalism Policymaking
Criteria" that executive branch departments and agencies must follow "when
formulating and implementing policies that have federalism implications." The
guidelines establish broad but ambiguous and unconstitutional tests to justify
intervention by the federal government in matters that typically are left to states and
local communities.
Source: The Heritage Foundation,
June 25, 1998
Executive Order 13083
Read President Clinton's order for a new Federalism.
Source: The White House, Office of the Press Secretary
Tough new laws on soot and smog
announced
Vice
President Al Gore and Environmental Protection Agency
Administrator Carol M. Browner announced new laws to
control air pollution.
"States will have until at least 2003 to tell the
EPA how they intend to reduce smog, or ozone, and until
2012 to start making those plans a reality."
Source: The Washington Times (online), July 17, 1997
Criminal-Background Checks
The Brady Act required that states perform background checks on
gun buyers. That provision of the Brady Act was declared unconstitutional by the
Supreme Court. In response to that decision of the Supreme Court, President
Clinton requested that states continuing doing the background checks.
Source: The Washington Times (online), July 1, 1997
Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
As explained by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D, California),
the Act exerts control over the states by setting "security standards
for key identification documents such as [state] birth certificates and
[state] drivers' licenses to prevent fraud and counterfeiting."
Source: Senate.gov
Increased Federal Enforcement of
Environmental Laws
The Denver office of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) will set up an office in Utah to
enforce federal laws and regulations about the
environment. The new office is expected to be operational
in August (1997).
Source: The Salt Lake Tribune, June
9, 1997
|